|
|
Post by T110MAS on Sept 4, 2004 18:59:26 GMT -5
hi per, will you ever be making a feature where you keep a record of how many doubles you get, like on clippers version? i think thats the only think i miss about my move from clippers to shockers! also can you do it for triples too? you say you are planning on changing the view of the profiles, where there is an extra part for trophies etc, but can you add that feature in also? oki another question here too. how about making a winning streak list for overall, not just the day, so it doesnt wipe out after the day has ended. it would be good to see like the longest streak ...this may cause the problem of chicken players, but i would like to see it considered! EDIT: also what do i have to do to become an official member of CPFL?! please answer all these questions dude  T110MAS |
|
|
|
Post by Rocketman on Sept 5, 2004 3:15:46 GMT -5
Yes, we could add that. But since we did not have the stats from the beginning, the number of doubles would not be so meaningful. E.g. a player at miniclip might have 5000 doubles in 4500 matches. That is more than 1 double per match. On Shockplay, you will have 4500 played matches, and 287 doubles. The stats wont be meaningful.
On miniclip, we track doubles, triples and quadruples. I dont know if anyone has ever made a quadruple yet though.
Yes, triples would be fun to track, because it is so much harder to make a triple than to make a sweep.
I think it will require a lot of work to do this, but maybe I can just add it to the Shocking News, as a start.
I think it is good that the winning streaks are cleared each day. Otherwise, people will go on forever and with some tricks try to get winningstreaks over 1000. E.g. decline some matches that they might lose.
But one thing that I will do, is save all the streaks after each day, so we can present some interesting stats, e.g. who has got the best winning streak ever, which day it was.
In February 2002, a member called Allmighty started 'NCP', No Chicken Play. A member of NCP had to follow there rules: Never shoot a defensive shot, pushing the opponents rings behind his base line or in the corners, and never decline a challenge.
In contrary to this, Zenjoy founded 'CPFL' which means Chicken Play For Life. I dont remember the rules exactly, because I was a member of NCP, but the goal was to win the matches by pushing. Im not sure if Zenjoy is playing with another name on Shockplay nowadays. Zenjoy, if you read this, please respond.
|
|
|
|
Post by T110MAS on Sept 5, 2004 8:11:27 GMT -5
thaks for the reply there per yeh i agree with you about the winning streaks not being cleared actually, as this would only emphasise the problem of chicken players. so scrap that! to the doubles, triples and QuAdRUpLuEs (which i dont think iv got) i think these woulds be an excellent idea, even if they were only added now. if it was a concern that ppl would have not added up the doubles from the start then you could make a note of the amount of games when it started on each players profile, like 'GAME No. WHEN DOUBLES STARTED' or whatever. <----would there be some asp script that could do that? to zenjoy, i havent seen him around either for ages. he came back a while ago, but then seemed to disappear again! finally, i think ill just keep the CPFL in my pesentation, and pretend im a member of it  thanks for the reply per T110MAS |
|
|
|
Post by muller on Sept 5, 2004 10:38:11 GMT -5
What is a quadruple? Hehe |
|
|
|
Post by TattooDude on Sept 5, 2004 10:47:12 GMT -5
when you get 4 in at the same time
|
|
|
|
Post by muller on Sept 5, 2004 11:37:18 GMT -5
Aha, not easy.. |
|
|
|
Post by lacey on Sept 5, 2004 13:11:03 GMT -5
But......you didnt keep the stats on the clean sweeps from the beginning and those are obviously VERY meaningful!  |
|
|
|
Post by T110MAS on Sept 5, 2004 15:30:47 GMT -5
lol ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by The Wolf on Dec 13, 2004 14:46:11 GMT -5
But......you didnt keep the stats on the clean sweeps from the beginning and those are obviously VERY meaningful!
true ......... many top players had played 1000s of games before the sweeps started counting
|
|
|
|
Post by Siddan on Dec 14, 2004 21:01:39 GMT -5
..and that was then.. now is now |
|
